Discovery & Library
The full Bettrlabs library, with your own products alongside it. Your team searches one place instead of asking who looked at this last. Category briefs, benchmarks, internal history.
You already have scientists, formulators and factories. What you do not have is one system that holds recipe, claims, rules and cost together. That is the part we run.
This is not a bigger Co-Build. It is for companies that already pay for their own R&D and want the software, not the service.
You have your own R&D team and want to make them faster, not replace them
You own or control manufacturing and are not looking for a factory
You run a portfolio across several categories at once
Formulation, claims, compliance and costing currently live in separate files
You need the work and the data to stay inside your organisation
You want someone else to develop the product for you
You are building one or two SKUs a year
You would rather not carry the R&D cost on your own books
You have no internal formulation capability to build on
If any of these describe you, Co-Build or Build will cost you less and move faster. We will say so on the call.
Every module runs on your own portfolio data. Nothing is a demo environment and nothing is shared with another brand.
The full Bettrlabs library, with your own products alongside it. Your team searches one place instead of asking who looked at this last. Category briefs, benchmarks, internal history.
Build and change recipes on screen. Nutrition, cost and label impact update as you go, so you only run a trial on a version worth trying. Recipe builder, nutrition engine, scenario compare.
Every claim checked against the limits and evidence it needs. Where a claim will not stand, we rewrite it so it does. Claim thresholds, evidence gaps, rewrites.
Ingredients, additive levels, category standards and label artwork checked against FSSAI rules. Continuously, not once at the end. Ingredient status, usage limits, label check.
Where to buy each ingredient, how much you are allowed to use, and what it costs. Cost work happens while you build the recipe, not after the quote.
One place holding every product your company is developing. Each one ends as a Buildfile™ a factory can work from. Pipeline view, specifications, handover.
Named seats for formulators, regulatory, procurement and category managers, each seeing the part of the system their role needs and nothing else.
Approval steps and naming set up the way your company already signs work off, not the way our default assumes.
Your portfolio, costs and specifications stay yours. Nothing is pooled, nothing trains a shared model, and nothing is visible to another brand.
Implementation scope, data residency, integration surface and user counts are agreed before the agreement is signed. Optional lab, pilot and factory support runs through the same Bettrlabs network your Co-Build partners use — see Labs & Network.
Extended R&D Pod — a Bettrlabs team, embedded alongside yours. From ₹2,49,900 / month. A dedicated pod working inside your programme rather than answering tickets from outside it. Add it to Enterprise or to Co-Build.
Both start with a conversation. The difference is who does the building and who carries the risk.
| Question | Co-Build | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Who develops the product | Bettrlabs develops it | Your team develops it, on our system |
| Who carries the build cost | Bettrlabs, until it manufactures | You do — it is already your R&D budget |
| What you pay | Annual fee plus Build & Care at production | Annual platform fee only |
| Who holds the technical file | Bettrlabs until recovered, then you | Yours throughout |
| Manufacturing | Our network, or a factory we qualify | Your own factories |
| Best when | You want more products than you can fund | You want your own R&D to move faster |
Some organisations run both — Enterprise for the internal portfolio, Co-Build for the categories where they would rather we carried the build. That is a normal arrangement, not an exception.
Enterprise only works when the fit is real. We scope it properly first, on your portfolio and your workflows, and we will tell you if a lighter model serves you better.
Tell us the size of your R&D team, your categories and what your stack looks like today.
A working session on how product development actually moves through your company, and where the system would sit.
Modules, seats, integrations and implementation. Or our recommendation that a lighter model fits you better.
Your environment is provisioned and your teams are onboarded.
Same system, your portfolio, your walls. It starts with a working session on how your product development actually runs today.